Frame the question
Define the research purpose, intended population and what the system should not conclude.
RESEARCH & COLLABORATION
Start with a question.
Design the evidence path.
Bring in-ear sensing, study context and AI-assisted review into a defined research workflow. Connect the records, assign the review responsibilities, and agree how a useful result will be evaluated.
FOLLOW THE STUDY
A connected view of repeated nights.
A research workspace for reviewing recording quality, participant context, and open questions across a longitudinal study.
CONTEXT INPUTS
- Authorized recording summaries and quality flags
- Consented diaries and event annotations
- Protocol version and reviewer notes
REVIEW OUTPUTS
- Source-linked cross-night review
- Unresolved-interval and documentation list
- A handoff for the next qualified reviewer
Study design, consent, data quality and clinical interpretation remain the research team’s responsibility.
Prepare a collaboration briefA COLLABORATION HAS TO BE TESTABLE
From a broad ambition
to a bounded study.
Agree the evidence
Set consent, source access, recording quality, analysis versions and retention expectations.
Prototype the review
Work with appropriately authorized or synthetic examples. Include missing intervals and conflicting records.
Evaluate and decide
Inspect grounding, comparability and review readiness before considering a broader deployment.
RESEARCH DELIVERABLES
Useful artifacts.
Clearly scoped.
Cross-night evidence brief
A referenced comparison of available records, changes in coverage and open interpretation questions.
Diary alignment register
Reported events and approximate timing alongside the source intervals they may relate to.
Study readiness checklist
Missing metadata, document versions and review approvals surfaced for a coordinator.
Review packet
An editable narrative, source index and unresolved-item list for qualified review.
Knowledge synthesis
A literature matrix scoped to a research question—not an individual diagnosis.
Structured handoff
Machine-readable fields preserving source, limitation, version and next reviewer action.
THE NEXT QUESTION IS WORTH EXPLORING